Home > Critical Thinking, Culture & Media, Liberalism, Philosophy > 7 Reasons Why Liberals Are Incapable of Understanding The World

7 Reasons Why Liberals Are Incapable of Understanding The World


The following is an outstanding find for instruction in analyzing the left and liberals.  I will comment further below in [italics] and add a few italicized emphases in the original text (regular bold is in the original).


John Hawkins is a professional blogger who runs Right Wing News, Linkiest, Viral Footage, & Trending Right. You can read more from John Hawkins on Facebook, Twitter, G+, You Tube, and at Raising Red.


To understand the workings of American politics, you have to understand this fundamental law: Conservatives think liberals are stupid. Liberals think conservatives are evil.Charles Krauthammer


Even liberals who’ve accomplished a lot in their lives and have high IQs often say things on a regular basis that are stunningly, profoundly stupid and at odds with the way the world works. Modern liberalism has become so bereft of common sense and instinctually suicidal that America can only survive over the long haul by thwarting the liberal agenda. In fact, liberalism has become such a toxic and poisonous philosophy that most liberals wouldn’t behave differently if their goal were to deliberately destroy the country. So, how does liberalism cause well-meaning, intelligent liberals to get this way? Well, it starts with…

1) Liberalism creates a feedback loop. It is usually impossible for a non-liberal to change a liberal’s mind about political issues because liberalism works like so: only liberals are credible sources of information. How do you know someone’s liberal? He espouses liberal doctrine. So, no matter how plausible what you say may be, it will be ignored if you’re not a liberal and if you are a liberal, of course, you probably agree with liberal views. This sort of close-mindedness makes liberals nearly impervious to any information that might undermine their beliefs.

[Philosophically, we are talking about the Asylum of Ignorance here.  For those new to this blog, the Asylum of Ignorance is what one creates in the mind to avoid confronting truth with which you disagree.  Your mind is made up and you don’t want to be confused by the facts.  For example, you will hold as true the assertion that Joe will come to the meeting wearing a red tie and will not consider it refuted if he comes wearing a green tie or no tie whatsoever.  I say “philosophically” because in philosophy, this is how you become meaningless.  When you hold to the truth of your position regardless of any data to the contrary, your position is meaningless.]


2) Liberals sources of information are ever present. Conservatives are regularly exposed to the liberal viewpoint whether they want to be or not. That’s not necessarily so for liberals. Imagine the average day for liberals. They get up and read their local newspaper. It has a liberal viewpoint. They take their kids to school, where the teachers are liberal. Then they go to work, listen to NPR which has a liberal viewpoint on the way home, and then turn on the nightly news which also skews leftward. From there, they turn on TV and watch shows created by liberals that lean to the left, if they have any political viewpoint at all. Unless liberals actively seek out conservative viewpoints, which is unlikely, the only conservative arguments they’re probably going to hear are going to be through the heavily distorted, poorly translated, deeply skeptical lens of other liberals.

[This is particularly true in Washington, D.C.  And the MSM it a main component of the problem.]


3) Liberals emphasize feeling superior, not superior results. Liberalism is all about appearances, not outcomes. What matters to liberals is how a program makes them FEEL about themselves, not whether it works or not. Thus a program like Headstart, which sounds good because it’s designed to help children read, makes liberals feel good about themselves, even though the program doesn’t work and wastes billions. A ban on DDT makes liberals feel good about themselves because they’re "protecting the environment" even though millions of people have died as a result. For liberals, it’s not what a program does in the real world; it’s about whether they feel better about themselves for supporting it.

[For an analysis of how we’ve gotten in this position, check out my series on Postman’s watershed work, Amusing Ourselves to Death.  First post here, final post here.  There are many in between.]


4) Liberals are big believers in moral relativism. This spins them round and round because if the only thing that’s wrong is saying that there’s an absolute moral code, then you lose your ability to tell cause from effect, good from bad, and right from wrong. Taking being non-judgmental to the level that liberals do leaves them paralyzed, pondering "why they hate us" because they feel incapable of saying, “That’s wrong," and doing something about it. If you’re against firm standards and condemning immoral behavior, then your moral compass won’t work and you’ll also be for immorality, as well as societal and cultural decay by default.

[And thus we have the moral dissonance of being for the murder of babies, aka, abortion and against the execution of known murderers, aka, capital punishment!]


5) Liberals tend to view people as parts of groups, not individuals. One of the prejudices of liberalism is that they see everyone as part of a group, not as an individual. This can lead to rather bizarre disparities when say, a man from a group that they consider to be powerless, impoverished victims becomes the leader of the free world — and he’s challenged by a group of lower middle class white people who’ve banded together because individually they’re powerless. If you listen to the liberal rhetoric, you might think Barack Obama was a black Republican being surrounded by a KKK lynching party 100 years ago — as opposed to the single most powerful man in America abusing the authority of his office to attack ordinary Tea Partiers who have the audacity to speak the truth to power for the good of their country.

[Interestingly, Christianity alone views people as individuals with both corporate responsibilities as well as individual rights and responsibilities in balance.  A related concept is that of “jurisdiction,” that is areas of responsibility some of which fall to individuals and some to collectives.  Because biblical revelation is generally rejected and consequently biblical ignorance runs rampant, this balance is rarely achieved these days.  The other advantage of thinking in terms of groups is it takes your eyes off of personal responsibility…see next point.]


6) Liberals take a dim view of personal responsibility. Who’s at fault if a criminal commits a crime? The criminal or society? If someone creates a business and becomes a millionaire, is that the result of hard work and talent or luck? If you’re dirt poor, starving, and haven’t worked in 5 years, is that a personal failing or a failure of the state? Conservatives would tend to say the former in each case, while liberals would tend to say the latter. But when you disconnect what an individual does from the results that happen in his life, it’s very difficult to understand cause and effect in people’s lives.

[And the God very specifically says throughout the Bible and in a multiplicity of ways, you shall reap what you sow.]


7) Liberals give themselves far too much credit just for being liberal. To many liberals, all one needs to do to be wise, intelligent, compassionate, open minded, and sensitive is to BE LIBERAL. In other words, many of the good things about a person spring not from his actions, but from the ideology he holds. This has an obvious appeal. You can be a diehard misogynist, but plausibly call yourself a feminist, hate blacks, but accuse others of racism, have a subpar IQ and be an intellectual, give nothing to charity and be compassionate, etc., etc., and all you have to do is call yourself a liberal. It’s a shortcut to virtue much like the corrupt old idea of religious indulgences. Why live a life of virtue when you could live a sinful life and buy your way into heaven? If you’re a liberal, why actually live a life of virtue when you can merely call yourself a liberal and get credit for being virtuous, even when you’ve done nothing to earn it?


  1. 9 Nov 2011 at 11:52 AM


    Great post.

    “If you’re a liberal, why actually live a life of virtue when you can merely call yourself a liberal and get credit for being virtuous, even when you’ve done nothing to earn it?”

    That quote sums it all up. How pathetic!

  2. DulyNoted
    16 Jan 2017 at 7:37 AM

    That is an awesome look at the inner workings of the liberal mind. Thank you.

  1. No trackbacks yet.

Your thoughts?

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: